This is a true statement, but the careful slicing away of that which is inconvenient causes a careless interpretation by bro. Stone. He says that Christ offered for the sins of the High Priest, and for the people's. This is a true statement. Christ did offer for the sins of the high priest, and of the people. Who was the high priest? Paul just told us. It was Jesus. So as the high priest, when he offered for the high priest, and then for the people; he was offering as this verse says, first for his own sins, and then for the people's. His own sins, of course, being his own sin nature.

Of course, this is not what bro. Stone means. He means that Jesus offered for the High Priests under the law, and then for the people. But the High Priest, under the law, if not functioning as High Priest, was simply not the High Priest. The interpretation offered by bro. Stone therefore, is impossible.